Icelanders [still] illiterate when it comes to “propaganda and baseless image-building.”
Icelandic government and media are jointly destroying the very foundation of democracy – free speech.
Human beings cannot change sex any more than they can make themselves invisible. That expressing disbelief in this vapid nonsense should be the subject of a front-page “news” article is a sad testimony to “Icelanders’ illiteracy in “any kind of propaganda and baseless image-building." 2010 Parliamentary Report on the Icelandic Bank Collapse, VIII, p. 195
In March 2022, Morgunblaðið published an article by the undersigned, The Ethical Trans Riddle (Siðræna transgátan), which criticized law no. 80/2019 on Gender autonomy (which is a misnomer; gender self-identification requires others to identify you as a member of the sex you say you are).
The law passed smoothly like a greased pig through Parliament (Alþingi), and Icelandic taxpayers now finance two state churches, as well as the privileges and perquisites that l. 80/2019 grant to the TransChurch’s congregation the basis of their faith and feelings.
A few days following the article’s publication, the Icelandic State Broadcasting Corporation’s (RÚV) morning news program broadcast an interview with a representative of Trans Iceland. RÚV's program description: “Trans Iceland criticized... the media for repeatedly publishing articles that belittle minority groups under the pretext that the writers are voicing their opinions. We spoke with... [representatives] of the organization, but the courts have not yet put legislation regarding publication of such articles to the test.”
RÚV's program description does not indicate that it occurred to the producers to talk to those who are accused of the despicable act of “belittling minorities.”
The sexual dimorphism of human beings is not an opinion but a fact. If T states that humans can change sex or that rain is dry, and I publicly state the facts that humans cannot change sex and that rain is wet, I am not "insulting" T. T may very well dislike these facts and find them disrespectful, but I am not responsible for T's feelings (nor is it the state media's responsibility to smear the reputation of people T believes have hurt T’s feelings).
Icelandic parents, whose children are in the clutches of the pseudoreligious trans cult, say that in Iceland no discussion is allowed about "trans" issues. They said they were grateful that an Icelander “finally grew a backbone” to discuss Trans ideology publicly.
If the media “repeatedly published articles'“ on this controversial issue, as Trans Iceland representatives claim – and thus fulfilled their democratic and social duty – Icelandic parents would not have had to ask strangers abroad for help in raising awareness of this dangerous cult. The institutions of Icelandic society would do well to reflect on the desperation of these parents whom they have utterly failed.
♾️ ♾️ ♾️
On the current Administration’s agenda is to tighten the criminal provisions of the General Criminal Code No. 19/1940 on defamation, which are based on the disgusting ideology of imprisoning people for their opinions. In the “proposal for a parliamentary resolution on an ‘action plan for queer people 2022-2025’”says:
"9.: Amendments will be made to Article 233 of the General Criminal Code, No. 19/1940 ‘...hate speech based on gender characteristics will be made a criminal offense.’ This ‘amendment ensures that hate crimes [will lead] to increased penalties.’ Members of the government are proud of this abominable proposition: ‘Similar legal provisions are not found in criminal legislation elsewhere in the Nordic countries.’”
Those who want “hate speech” legislation have in common with dictators a hatred of speech. Such legislation is a favorite tool of tyrants, because they define the “hate speech” du jour. There is no objective definition of “hate speech.” One person's “hate speech” is another person's love language (or a biological fact).
No one should be surprised that free speech is not on the Left Greens’ list of priorities and goals. Freedom of speech in the Left Greens’ lexicon is the freedom of the state to imprison you if your speech is contrary to the views of the party.”
♾️ ♾️ ♾️
The above is from an article I wrote almost a year and a half ago and sent to all "print" media in Iceland without success. No Icelandic media outlet wanted to publish the article nor would they explain why the article was deemed unfit for publication.
Icelandic journalists do not seem very worried about the demise of free speech in their country. Perhaps the profession is relieved that doing the real job of a news reporter, which requires one to think critically and ask difficult and unpleasant questions, has become as good as illegal. By undermining the foundations of free speech, the Icelandic government and the media have jointly threatened the basis of democracy in Iceland.
The part of the government’s "action plan for queer people" (the Deluxe Citizens) which refers to the "increased penalties" for speech crimes is now part of the General Criminal Code no. 19/1940.
Nato – en antivit och familjefientlig institution . . .
Efter apokalypsen 1945 har som bekant en rad globala organisationer bildats med syfte att upprätthålla och expandera den totalitära liberalismen. En av de tidigaste organisationer som bildades i detta syfte var krigsalliansen ”Nordatlantiska fördragsorganisationen”, eller Nato, som kan ses som globalismens militära gren.
Förutom att försäkra att Washington alltid har internationellt stöd för sina militära kampanjer är Nato som institution uttalat antivit och uttryckligen dedikerad till ”raslig rättvisa” för rasfrämlingar som bor i vita länder. Redan 1999 författade Nato rapporter där man skyller en rad moderna problem på nationalister och varnar för nationalismens inflytande.
Under 2023 höll krigsalliansen ett toppmöte på högkvarteret i Bryssel om ras där krigsalliansens ledare bedyrade att bekämpa ”homogena attityder” och att man skulle använda Natos ”kollektiva underrättelseinformation” för ändamålet.
Faktum är att Nato är så dedikerat till sin antivita agenda att man öppet förespråkar att institutioner måste omformas för att bli ”inkluderande”, med andra ord omstruktureras för att bli mer antivita och bestå av färre vita anställda och chefer.
https://nordfront.se/nato-en-antivit-och-familjefientlig-institution
"There is no objective definition of “hate speech.” One person's “hate speech” is another person's love language (or a biological fact)." Yes, it is an act of love to challenge somebody's gender identity. It feels so risky.