Twitter Speech & Language Crimes Cops

I agree with Democratic strategist James Carville, who says he knows exactly why his party lost so badly on Tuesday: "Stupid wokeness." His argument is that by focusing on “defunding the police [except the Thought Crimes Police] or on proper pronouns for transgender people, Democrats are talking too much about issues that matter less to a broad swath of Americans than, say, the economy.”

Today I was looking at Carville’s Twitter account and attempted to reply to his sentiments, that voters - and especially women voters - didn’t appreciate Democratic support for these and other dangerous ideas (like legalizing experimental medical treatments on minors - based on children’s “self-diagnosis,” to boot). I wrote something brilliant like “Yeah, ya think?” and attached this screenshot.

Here’s what Big Bro Big Bird thought about that:

Really? I already said, “yeah, ya think”? Actually, today it doesn’t matter what I say (write) on Twitter. After replying last night to some mindless propaganda of transactivists and “allies” in response to a New European article about J.K. Rowling, everything I say, I “already said,” according to the Twitter Speech Crimes Police force. So shut up!

This is probably a message you get when the Twitter Speech & Language Crimes Police are getting ready to have you prosecuted and punished for hate speech and related crimes, such as public discourse (to quote my dear friend Titania McGrath: “As a popular female presence on social media, I am often subject to a common form of harassment known as ‘debate’.”).

“Some of these people need to go to a 'woke' detox center or something," Carville said. “They're expressing a language that people just don't use, and there's backlash and a frustration at that."

Ya think?